New Surgo Analysis Suggests Arizona’s Premature Openings in May Exacerbated COVID-19 Racial Disparities

By leveraging external data sources and its own COVID-19 Community Vulnerability Index (CCVI), Surgo Foundation today released its first state-wide COVID-19 analysis: a deep dive into the state of Arizona to assess whether there are relationships between Arizona’s most vulnerable communities and community COVID-19 case growth, access to testing sites, and social distancing behaviors over the last seven week period.

The analysis found that “highly vulnerable” communities in Arizona's Native American and border regions—identified as such months before the pandemic hit its current peak—have indeed seen significantly higher viral spread over the past five weeks.  These areas also suffer from weaker healthcare infrastructure and sub-optimal housing, which makes them more vulnerable to other negative consequences of a COVID outbreak, such as increased financial hardship or secondary health effects.

The analysis also showed that Arizona Governor Ducey’s recent policy decisions regarding letting the stay-at-home order expire may have disproportionately harmed the most vulnerable communities in the state, leading now to a 40% disparity in case rates between primarily Native American and Hispanic populations and other Arizonans.

“Our analysis strongly suggests that Arizona’s premature re-openings worsened racial disparities in the state, with Native Americans feeling the brunt,” said Dr. Sema Sgaier, executive director of Surgo Foundation. “Our goal in sharing this state-wide analysis is to show other states how they can use the index to get ahead of the virus rather than be overwhelmed by it after it is too late. We hope other states can learn from Arizona’s example.”

Other key findings of the Arizona analysis include:

  1. Native Americans and other vulnerable populations are bearing the brunt of the spike following the stay-at-home order lifting, with 40% higher case rates than the rest of the state. Counties identified as highly vulnerable in early March - including Apache, Navajo, and Santa Cruz counties -  have been disproportionately hit by the surging case growth in the weeks following May’s stay-at-home order lifting. As of July 1, these counties have rates that are 40% higher than the rest of the state - and 400% higher than their own infection rates at the beginning of June. 

  2. Testing deserts in Arizona compound the challenges for vulnerable communities. People in these vulnerable communities are required to travel up to twice as far to access a COVID-19 test site than people in less vulnerable areas. In urban Arizona, 2 million residents of highly vulnerable areas are required to travel 2.4x as far (7 miles on average, versus 3) to access a test site; and vulnerable rural Arizonans must travel 19 miles, on average, compared to less than 10 for non-vulnerable rural Arizonans. 

  3. The racial disparities are growing as Latinos in vulnerable border communities join Native Americans in vulnerable counties with the highest infection rates in the state. Border counties are driving the recent rapid per-capita case growth in Arizona, joining the already hard-hit Native American communities. These counties, like Yuma and Santa Cruz in particular, are also vulnerable in terms of socioeconomic factors and their high proportions of minority populations, especially Latino populations.

  4. With social distancing lower than it was pre-pandemic, a growing threat in Coconina and La Paz Counties looms as case rates spike.  Dramatic drops in social distancing in inland counties Coconina and La Paz may point toward the newest threat of rising per-capita case growth.  While on average, Arizona maintained social distancing, with levels of mobility 16% below average in the last week of June, Coconina and La Paz actually increased mobility by 23% and 44%, respectively, over pre-pandemic levels. At the same time, these counties’ per capita case counts are skyrocketing, on their way to join the hardest-hit counties in the state. 

The COVID Community Vulnerability Index is featured as a CDC resource for federal, state, and local planners and responders. It ranks communities on a scale of 0 to 1—where 0 is the least vulnerable and 1 is the most vulnerable. It measures six kinds of vulnerability: minority status and languages spoken; socioeconomic status; household composition and disability; access to transportation and housing; epidemiological factors; and health system factors. 

Technical Notes:

Data updated as of July 1. Case and death data are from the JHU Github repository, which tracks daily confirmed cases from February 24 onwards. Testing location data was compiled from GISCorps a testing repository  maintained through validated, crowdsourced data.  Social distancing analyses are based on mobile data from Unacast’s Data for Good Initiative. For an updated version of these stats, contact Bethany Hardy at 202-277-3848.

About Surgo Foundation

Surgo Foundation, based in Washington, D.C., is a nonprofit organization dedicated to solving health and social problems with precision.  We do this by bringing together all the tools available from behavioral science, data science, and artificial intelligence to unlock solutions that will improve and save lives. We work in the United States and in low-income countries on issues like COVID-19, HIV/AIDS, tuberculosis, maternal mortality, health care, housing, and more.  Visit us at surgofoundation.org.

About the COVID-19 Community Vulnerability Index (CCVI) 

Surgo Foundation developed the COVID-19 Community Vulnerability Index (CCVI) to help federal, state, and local leaders target vulnerable communities with more informed and effective interventions. This index—completely open access, and featured as a resource on the CDC’s website—ranks U.S. communities in terms of their vulnerability to COVID-19 based on six key factors: socioeconomic status; household composition and disability; minority status and language spoken; access to housing and transportation; epidemiologic factors; and healthcare system factors. The index also provides community-level data COVID-19 cases and mortality, as well as how much social distancing is happening within a community.

Contact: Bethany Hardy at Surgo Foundation at bethanyhardy@surgofoundation.org or (202) 277-3848.

New Surgo Analysis Identifies Highly Vulnerable Rural Communities as COVID-19 Testing Deserts

jen-theodore-cFZCFAa8XPw-unsplash.jpg

Nearly two-thirds (64%) of all rural counties in the United States do not have a COVID-19 testing site, leaving 20.7 million people in a testing desert, according to a new Surgo Foundation analysis. 

“When it comes to COVID-19, not all rural counties are created equal. We’ve identified highly vulnerable rural counties that are far less likely to overcome a COVID-19 outbreak due to a number of socio-economic, health, and structural factors,” said Dr. Sema Sgaier, executive director of Surgo Foundation. “Within these highly vulnerable rural counties, a troubling pattern is emerging: they now have as many new COVID-19 cases per week, on average, as urban counties. And with so many COVID testing deserts in rural America, the true spread in these hot spots could be even higher.” 

In these rural counties, which Surgo has identified as “highly vulnerable” based on its COVID-19 Community Vulnerability Index, cases and deaths are growing much faster than in their “less vulnerable” rural counterparts: 

Vulnerable counties have consistently faced faster spread of infection and rise of deaths. This disparity continues to increase disproportionately in vulnerable rural America:

Picture 1.png

Of the rural population without a COVID-19 testing site, 8.5 million (41% of this population, 20% of the total rural population) live in highly vulnerable areas geographically concentrated in four states: Kentucky, Mississippi, North Carolina, and Arkansas.

More than half of the population living in rural, vulnerable testing deserts are located in ten states:

*Showing only states with >5% of population

*Showing only states with >5% of population

Drilling deeper, 1.27 million rural Black Americans (35% of the rural black population) live in highly vulnerable testing deserts. Compared to the average rural American, Black Americans are 1.7 times more likely to live in these areas. And rural Black Americans are 2.7 times as likely to be living in a vulnerable area with a lack of testing sites and increasing deaths, compared to the average rural American:

Picture 3.png

“If you’re a Black person living in rural America, you’re nearly three times as likely to be living in a testing desert where deaths are rising, compared to any average rural American,” added Sgaier. “We simply can’t afford to ignore rural communities in our fight against both coronavirus and its racial inequities.”     

The 20 Rural Testing Deserts Hardest Hit by COVID-19

In addition, using data from GISCorps about COVID testing sites, Surgo Foundation released a list of the 20 most vulnerable rural counties in the U.S. today with no test sites and the most COVID deaths per capita. Of these 20 counties, 15 have a higher proportion of Black residents compared to the national average (approx. 13%).

1, 2 National US rates are 654.8 cases per 100K, and 35.8 deaths per 100K

1, 2 National US rates are 654.8 cases per 100K, and 35.8 deaths per 100K

Technical Notes:

Data updated as of June 17th: Case and death data are from the JHU Github repository, which tracks daily confirmed cases from February 24th onwards. Both testing location data and COVID case data is regularly updated, so numbers may change slightly by time of publishing. For an updated version of these stats, contact Bethany Hardy at 202-277-3848.

Media Contact: Bethany Hardy at Surgo Foundation at bethanyhardy@surgofoundation.org or (202) 277-3848.

Surgo Recommends Tackling COVID-19 Racial Disparities with More Precise Data

stewart-caplan-smittenaar-sema-sgaier-covid-data-race-592x333.jpg

Black Americans are dying at a disproportionate rate from COVID-19. Tackling this disparity requires precise, data-driven solutions, but granular race, ethnicity, and demographic data on COVID are limited. In a new Stanford Social Innovation Review (SSIR) article, Surgo Foundation argues that rather than waiting for data collection and reporting systems to improve, we can act now by leveraging the COVID-19 Community Vulnerable Index (CCVI).

According to the CVVI, 60 percent of black Americans live in COVID-vulnerable communities while only 34 percent of white Americans do. Analyzing the CCVI through the lens of race allows for more targeted, effective interventions--from neighborhood-specific approaches in cities to prioritizing the deployment of testing, contact tracing, and supported isolation in vulnerable rural communities. 

Read the full article, “Fighting COVID-19's Disproportionate Impact on Black Communities With More Precise Data.”